Mid-American · 2026
Bowling Green
2–6
CFPi+ rank#131of 138 FBS teams
-17.9CFPi+ rating
#111Best: TPi+ talent
#135Weakest: Offense
4Games left
Where the team ranks
CFPi+#131-17.9
Offense#135+14.0
Defense#115+31.9
How efficiently it plays
EPi+#131-18.5
Off EPi+#117-8.1
Def EPi+#122+10.4
Offense and defense
| Stat | Offense | Defense |
|---|---|---|
| Success rate | #8741.3% | #12145.8% |
| Explosiveness | #133+1.076 | #95+1.283 |
| Havoc rate | #11517.3% | #11213.5% |
| Pass PPA | #68+0.229 | #86+0.222 |
| Rush PPA | #133-0.116 | #121+0.178 |
Raw season splits, not opponent-adjusted. Defense #1 is the stingiest in the country.
The roster and the staff
TPi+#111-9.5
Recruiting#108-7.0
Returning#93-7.2
247 talent#111568.3
Head coach#122-14.6
What other systems say
Composite#130-20.5
SP+#130-18.2
SP+ off#129+15.4
SP+ def#118+33.5
ESPN FPI#130-17.9
The box-score view
Yards/G#135288.0
Yards/G allowed#99383.1
Pass yards/G#118179.8
Rush yards/G#126108.3
3rd down#8139.0%
3rd down allowed#5035.6%
Sacks/G#462.4
Takeaways/G#891.0
Ranks are national out of 138 FBS teams and #1 is best. The bar shows where a rank sits in the field; the rating is the source beneath it.
Every game, with the model's read
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Projected | Win prob | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs Tarleton State | L 13–20 | Final | |||
| 2 | @ #19Nebraska | L 7–56 | Final | |||
| 3 | @ Iowa State | L 7–55 | Final | |||
| 4 | vs South Florida | L 6–14 | Final | |||
| 5 | @ Miami (OH) | W 24–20 | Final | |||
| 6 | vs Sacramento State | W 38–10 | Final | |||
| 7 | vs Ball State | L 31–32 | Final | |||
| 8 | @ Buffalo | L 24–31 | Final | |||
| 9 | @ Western Michigan | — | ||||
| 11 | vs Kent State | — | ||||
| 12 | @ Toledo | — | ||||
| 13 | vs Massachusetts | — | ||||
Unlock Bowling Green’s remaining schedule
CFPi-X V4.0 Selected · data vintage 10/26/2026