Mid-American · 2026
Western Michigan
5–3
CFPi+ rank#83of 138 FBS teams
-4.5CFPi+ rating
#73Best: National composite
#108Weakest: TPi+ talent
4Games left
Where the team ranks
CFPi+#83-4.5
Offense#90+22.4
Defense#76+26.9
How efficiently it plays
EPi+#82-4.1
Off EPi+#77-1.7
Def EPi+#88+2.3
Offense and defense
| Stat | Offense | Defense |
|---|---|---|
| Success rate | #7742.1% | #10143.8% |
| Explosiveness | #103+1.179 | #19+1.131 |
| Havoc rate | #4313.5% | #10913.8% |
| Pass PPA | #93+0.142 | #64+0.147 |
| Rush PPA | #54+0.136 | #63+0.041 |
Raw season splits, not opponent-adjusted. Defense #1 is the stingiest in the country.
The roster and the staff
TPi+#108-9.1
Recruiting#101-6.1
Returning#1+20.6
247 talent#108572.2
Head coach#89-3.7
What other systems say
Composite#73-1.0
SP+#86-2.7
SP+ off#101+22.8
SP+ def#65+25.8
ESPN FPI#81-3.1
The box-score view
Yards/G#123325.9
Yards/G allowed#79368.6
Pass yards/G#128163.8
Rush yards/G#61162.1
3rd down#4942.4%
3rd down allowed#8939.6%
Sacks/G#462.4
Takeaways/G#831.1
Ranks are national out of 138 FBS teams and #1 is best. The bar shows where a rank sits in the field; the rating is the source beneath it.
Every game, with the model's read
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Projected | Win prob | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @ Michigan | L 12–13 | Final | |||
| 2 | vs Monmouth | W 49–14 | Final | |||
| 3 | @ Rice | W 28–21 | Final | |||
| 4 | vs Boise State | L 7–32 | Final | |||
| 5 | @ Buffalo | W 20–17 | Final | |||
| 6 | vs Kent State | W 38–7 | Final | |||
| 7 | @ Central Michigan | W 21–14 | Final | |||
| 8 | @ Toledo | L 38–45 | Final | |||
| 9 | vs Bowling Green | — | ||||
| 11 | @ Akron | — | ||||
| 12 | vs Eastern Michigan | — | ||||
| 13 | vs Miami (OH) | — | ||||
Unlock Western Michigan’s remaining schedule
CFPi-X V4.0 Selected · data vintage 10/26/2026