American Athletic · 2026
UTSA
7–1
CFPi+ rank#59of 138 FBS teams
+2.5CFPi+ rating
#36Best: Head coach
#72Weakest: TPi+ talent
4Games left
Where the team ranks
CFPi+#59+2.5
Offense#51+28.1
Defense#66+25.6
How efficiently it plays
EPi+#70-0.2
Off EPi+#47+2.9
Def EPi+#95+3.1
Offense and defense
| Stat | Offense | Defense |
|---|---|---|
| Success rate | #3546.8% | #6640.6% |
| Explosiveness | #110+1.165 | #84+1.261 |
| Havoc rate | #2412.3% | #10514.0% |
| Pass PPA | #81+0.193 | #70+0.174 |
| Rush PPA | #16+0.224 | #101+0.128 |
Raw season splits, not opponent-adjusted. Defense #1 is the stingiest in the country.
The roster and the staff
TPi+#72-1.5
Recruiting#78-1.8
Returning#56+7.0
247 talent#72655.8
Head coach#36+7.9
What other systems say
Composite#60+2.9
SP+#59+3.5
SP+ off#38+31.5
SP+ def#82+28.0
ESPN FPI#67+0.5
The box-score view
Yards/G#56409.0
Yards/G allowed#104391.5
Pass yards/G#74224.4
Rush yards/G#41184.6
3rd down#5242.3%
3rd down allowed#7638.5%
Sacks/G#1271.1
Takeaways/G#251.6
Ranks are national out of 138 FBS teams and #1 is best. The bar shows where a rank sits in the field; the rating is the source beneath it.
Every game, with the model's read
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Projected | Win prob | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs UT Rio Grande Valley | W 45–16 | Final | |||
| 2 | @ Texas State | W 31–26 | Final | |||
| 3 | @ #7Texas | L 6–30 | Final | |||
| 4 | vs Colorado State | W 59–45 | Final | |||
| 5 | @ Rice | W 16–14 | Final | |||
| 6 | vs South Florida | W 31–24 | Final | |||
| 7 | vs Navy | W 38–34 | Final | |||
| 8 | @ Tulane | W 42–19 | Final | |||
| 10 | @ Florida Atlantic | — | ||||
| 11 | vs North Texas | — | ||||
| 12 | @ UAB | — | ||||
| 13 | vs Tulsa | — | ||||
Unlock UTSA’s remaining schedule
CFPi-X V4.0 Selected · data vintage 10/26/2026



#7







