SEC · 2026
Texas
5–2
CFPi+ rank#7of 138 FBS teams
+23.1CFPi+ rating
#2Best: Defense
#11Weakest: EPi+ efficiency
5Games left
Where the team ranks
CFPi+#7+23.1
Offense#8+35.6
Defense#2+12.5
How efficiently it plays
EPi+#11+18.7
Off EPi+#65+0.2
Def EPi+#1-18.5
Offense and defense
| Stat | Offense | Defense |
|---|---|---|
| Success rate | #7942.0% | #834.4% |
| Explosiveness | #98+1.190 | #26+1.145 |
| Havoc rate | #12818.3% | #1119.8% |
| Pass PPA | #80+0.198 | #29+0.049 |
| Rush PPA | #112+0.007 | #23-0.060 |
Raw season splits, not opponent-adjusted. Defense #1 is the stingiest in the country.
The roster and the staff
TPi+#2+28.7
Recruiting#3+27.7
Returning#30+11.8
247 talent#2985.2
Head coach#7+19.0
What other systems say
Composite#10+18.3
SP+#8+20.4
SP+ off#16+34.6
SP+ def#7+14.5
ESPN FPI#8+24.0
The box-score view
Yards/G#87369.6
Yards/G allowed#15285.4
Pass yards/G#73224.7
Rush yards/G#87144.9
3rd down#7839.2%
3rd down allowed#3133.3%
Sacks/G#182.7
Takeaways/G#691.1
Ranks are national out of 138 FBS teams and #1 is best. The bar shows where a rank sits in the field; the rating is the source beneath it.
Every game, with the model's read
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Projected | Win prob | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs Texas State | W 59–7 | Final | |||
| 2 | vs #3Ohio State | W 24–23 | Final | |||
| 3 | vs UTSA | W 30–6 | Final | |||
| 4 | @ #10Tennessee | W 20–17 | Final | |||
| 6 | vs #22Oklahoma | L 24–27 | Final | |||
| 7 | vs #21Florida | L 24–27 | Final | |||
| 8 | vs #9Ole Miss | W 34–27 | Final | |||
| 9 | vs Mississippi State | — | ||||
| 10 | @ #25Missouri | — | ||||
| 11 | @ #4LSU | — | ||||
| 12 | vs Arkansas | — | ||||
| 13 | @ #23Texas A&M | — | ||||
Unlock Texas’s remaining schedule
CFPi-X V4.0 Selected · data vintage 10/26/2026


#3
#10
#22
#21
#9
#25
#4
#23