SEC · 2026
Oklahoma
1–0
#11
CFPi+
View full team outlook in the War Room →
CFPi+ Index
CFPi+
+19.2#11
Offense
+31.6#33
Defense
+12.5#3
National Composite
+19.6#9
EPi+ Efficiency
+15.2#16
TPi+ Talent
+18.8#12
Head Coach
+7.4#38
EPi+ Efficiency Index
EPi+
+9.0#38
Off EPi+
+3.8#50
Def EPi+
-5.3#33
Off Success
54.5%#32
Def Success
37.8%#71
Havoc Created
27.1%#13
Advanced Stats
| Stat | Offense | Rank | Defense | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Success Rate | 54.5% | #32 | 37.8% | #71 |
| Explosiveness | +1.4 | #33 | +0.9 | #9 |
| Havoc Rate | 11.7% | #57 | 27.1% | #13 |
| Pass PPA | +1.0 | #6 | -0.0 | #39 |
| Rush PPA | +0.1 | #78 | -0.1 | #55 |
TPi+ Talent Index
TPi+
+18.8#12
Recruiting
+18.7#14
Returning
+13.8#15
247 Talent
851.1#17
Head Coach
+7.4#38
National Composite
C
+19.6#9
SP+
+21.7#10
SP+ Off
+34.0#16
SP+ Def
+12.6#5
ESPN FPI
+19.2#11
Traditional Stats
Yards/G
401.0#70
Yards/G Allowed
198.0#30
Pass Yards/G
231.0#69
Rush Yards/G
170.0#63
3rd Down
54.5%#35
3rd Down Allowed
15.4%#16
Sacks/G
4.0#15
Takeaways/G
2.0#23
2026 Scheduleprojected 7.42–4.58
Record
1–1
Simulated
8–4
Projected
7.0–5.0
Best case
9–3
Worst case
4–8
| WK | OPPONENT | RESULT | PROJECTED | WIN PROB | MARKET | EDGE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs#134 UTEP | W 51–0 | Final | |||
| 2 | @#19 Michigan | L 10–17 | Final | |||
| 3 | vs#72 New Mexico | — | Win by 27.6 38–10 | 94.3% | — | — |
| 4 | @#2 Georgia | — | Lose by 18.0 16–34 | 15.0% | +10 | -8.0 |
| 6 | vs#4 Texas | — | Lose by 7.0 20–27 | 34.4% | +6 | -1.0 |
| 7 | vs#39 Kentucky | — | Win by 20.2 34–13 | 87.7% | — | — |
| 8 | @#32 Mississippi State | — | Win by 4.1 28–24 | 59.4% | — | — |
| 9 | vs#17 South Carolina | — | Win by 11.6 28–17 | 74.7% | — | — |
| 10 | @#15 Florida | — | Lose by 5.3 20–26 | 38.1% | — | — |
| 11 | vs#18 Ole Miss | — | Win by 11.6 31–20 | 74.8% | -4 | +7.6 |
| 12 | vs#8 Texas A&M | — | Win by 6.0 27–21 | 63.5% | -2.5 | +3.5 |
| 13 | @#25 Missouri | — | Win by 3.1 24–21 | 57.2% | — | — |
CFPi+ V2026.2 · data vintage 9/8/2026