ACC · 2026
SMU
6–1
CFPi+ rank#35of 138 FBS teams
+9.7CFPi+ rating
#13Best: Head coach
#43Weakest: EPi+ efficiency
5Games left
Where the team ranks
CFPi+#35+9.7
Offense#32+31.4
Defense#37+21.7
How efficiently it plays
EPi+#43+6.7
Off EPi+#39+4.6
Def EPi+#52-2.1
Offense and defense
| Stat | Offense | Defense |
|---|---|---|
| Success rate | #1649.3% | #3337.8% |
| Explosiveness | #65+1.257 | #115+1.331 |
| Havoc rate | #2312.3% | #1819.3% |
| Pass PPA | #6+0.495 | #37+0.078 |
| Rush PPA | #83+0.077 | #90+0.099 |
Raw season splits, not opponent-adjusted. Defense #1 is the stingiest in the country.
The roster and the staff
TPi+#31+8.5
Recruiting#50+5.5
Returning#60+5.8
247 talent#31764.5
Head coach#13+16.0
What other systems say
Composite#36+9.7
SP+#21+13.4
SP+ off#19+34.1
SP+ def#31+20.4
ESPN FPI#27+12.3
The box-score view
Yards/G#12473.9
Yards/G allowed#24303.3
Pass yards/G#7316.0
Rush yards/G#66157.9
3rd down#3345.3%
3rd down allowed#427.3%
Sacks/G#113.0
Takeaways/G#1090.9
Ranks are national out of 138 FBS teams and #1 is best. The bar shows where a rank sits in the field; the rating is the source beneath it.
Every game, with the model's read
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Projected | Win prob | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @ Florida State | W 27–24 | Final | |||
| 2 | vs UC Davis | W 56–10 | Final | |||
| 3 | @ Louisville | L 31–41 | Final | |||
| 4 | vs Missouri State | W 34–24 | Final | |||
| 5 | vs Boston College | W 25–16 | Final | |||
| 7 | vs Virginia | W 23–13 | Final | |||
| 8 | vs California | W 59–20 | Final | |||
| 9 | @ Syracuse | — | ||||
| 10 | vs Virginia Tech | — | ||||
| 11 | vs #17Wake Forest | — | ||||
| 12 | @ #5Notre Dame | — | ||||
| 13 | @ Stanford | — | ||||
Unlock SMU’s remaining schedule
CFPi-X V4.0 Selected · data vintage 10/26/2026










#17
#5