Big Ten · 2026
Rutgers
2–5
CFPi+ rank#85of 138 FBS teams
-4.6CFPi+ rating
#48Best: TPi+ talent
#118Weakest: EPi+ efficiency
5Games left
Where the team ranks
CFPi+#85-4.6
Offense#66+25.3
Defense#98+30.0
How efficiently it plays
EPi+#118-11.7
Off EPi+#66+0.2
Def EPi+#127+11.8
Offense and defense
| Stat | Offense | Defense |
|---|---|---|
| Success rate | #5144.7% | #13549.3% |
| Explosiveness | #19+1.343 | #104+1.306 |
| Havoc rate | #8615.6% | #11913.1% |
| Pass PPA | #61+0.249 | #122+0.368 |
| Rush PPA | #90+0.053 | #135+0.287 |
Raw season splits, not opponent-adjusted. Defense #1 is the stingiest in the country.
The roster and the staff
TPi+#48+3.4
Recruiting#39+6.3
Returning#37+10.8
247 talent#48709.0
Head coach#54+3.2
What other systems say
Composite#95-5.6
SP+#95-4.9
SP+ off#54+28.7
SP+ def#124+34.0
ESPN FPI#87-4.4
The box-score view
Yards/G#62395.3
Yards/G allowed#121416.7
Pass yards/G#54242.1
Rush yards/G#73153.1
3rd down#6341.1%
3rd down allowed#11042.5%
Sacks/G#1091.4
Takeaways/G#891.0
Ranks are national out of 138 FBS teams and #1 is best. The bar shows where a rank sits in the field; the rating is the source beneath it.
Every game, with the model's read
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Projected | Win prob | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs Massachusetts | L 21–37 | Final | |||
| 2 | @ Boston College | L 21–28 | Final | |||
| 3 | vs USC | L 35–42 | Final | |||
| 4 | vs Howard | W 58–7 | Final | |||
| 5 | vs #8Indiana | L 15–47 | Final | |||
| 7 | @ Maryland | W 37–30 | Final | |||
| 8 | @ Northwestern | L 14–42 | Final | |||
| 9 | vs Michigan | — | ||||
| 10 | @ Wisconsin | — | ||||
| 11 | vs #19Nebraska | — | ||||
| 12 | @ Penn State | — | ||||
| 13 | vs Michigan State | — | ||||
Unlock Rutgers’s remaining schedule
CFPi-X V4.0 Selected · data vintage 10/26/2026





#8



#19
